This is a cell phone photo one of several taken of a living room in or near Lufkin Texas of a friend of mine after her dog became spooked . This is the only photo that had anything out of the ordinary to show up in it also . Kat has asked me to move it to the main forum for more discussion and everyone to see you can go to my photos and see her enhancement if she doesn't put it here with her comments also . Well I hope I've got it in the right place and this works out . I've downloaded and put the enhanced by Kats version here also if they show up .
Thanks John
Permalink Reply by John on November 2, 2009 at 7:31pm
No Tkay , I have asked her to join the group and sent the links I hope she will then we can get more from her and maybe the data I don't think she had lightened this one as she said she had been sick and had not felt like working with it but I don't know for sure , If you want to get a copy from my photobucket site here's the link
( http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee135/kentuckycowboy2/ )
John
Permalink Reply by John on November 4, 2009 at 7:55am
I think she is going to join us , I see jpeg snoop has a few issues with false negatives esp from older cameras and when they've been up and down loaded also .
John
I can see what plainly looks like a figure, but I have to ask myself: Is it really a figure?
I see what appears to be a robed floating figure with maybe a hand & a twisted face in the corner.
On closer examination, I see that the dark robe part of the figure is clearly the shadow of the curtain & valence being cast by the strong light outside the window.
Not really sure what the hand and face are caused by, but when I discount the robe, the imllusion if a figure is destroyed. The two lighter blobs no longer look like a hand and face to me.
Permalink Reply by Gail on November 4, 2009 at 6:11pm
This photo was taken in my living room. After reading the reply by Bathory313, I went to the website for the program used to examine the photo. I downloaded it myself and checked the photo. I got the same results. I tried it on photos that I know are original and authenic because I took them with a Sony camera. It showed some of those to be "edited" or "processed". I contacted the inventor of that program. He responded to me today. He explained why it shows to be "edited" or "Processed" The photo was taken with a cell phone. Here is the email from the man, named "Cal". I've sent him the photo along with others from my Sony camera so he can try to improve the accuracy of the program.
ImpulseAdventure Comment Notification
From: ImpulseAdventure
You may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as junk
Sent: Wed 11/04/09 7:02 AM
Hi Gail -- The JPEGsnoop database is focused primarily upon standard digital cameras rather than cell phone cameras. When you take a photo with a cell phone and email it, it is quite possible that the process resizes the photo to make it more suitable for email, or else leaves an indication that looks similar to what a photo editing program might do. If you can attach a sample photo to this email, I might be able to help improve the accuracy of the program in these cases. Thanks,cal
ORIGINAL POSTING:================= I had a photo emailed to me by my son, who took the photo while standing in my living room, then emailed it directly to me. This program said there was a high probability that the photo was edited, which if it was, I don't know when my son had the chance to do that since he snapped the photo, showed it to me on his cell phone, then emailed it to me from his phone. I started checking other photos in my computer that I know are original and unaltered, yet every one of them showed up as being edited or whatever. I didn't find a single one that showed to be original or unaltered. I know they're not altered because these are my own photos of family or things around my home. Why does it show to be altered?